The following is a list of the top ten highest campaign contributors to Senator John McCain since 1992 in the gambling industry, based on analysis of data from the Center for Responsive Politics.
1. MGM Mirage
$108,450
2. Mashantucket Pequot Tribe
$56,950
3. Wynn Resorts
$39,800
4. Las Vegas Sands
$32,500
5. International Game Technology
$19,450
6. Harrah's Entertainment
$14,000
7. Station Casinos
$13,800
8. Mandalay Resort Group
$10,000
9. (tie) Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona
$8,000
Stockbridge-Munsee Community
$8,000
Media Man Australia Profiles
Casino News Media
Political News Media blog. Australian and international politics. Local, State, Federal. American politics. Part of the Media Man Group
Sunday, September 28, 2008
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
Malcolm Turnbull ousts Brendan Nelson as Liberal Party leader, by Phillip Hudson - The Sydney Morning Herald - 16th September 2008
Malcolm Turnbull today took the Liberal leadership by just four votes - 45 to 41 - from Brendan Nelson, saying he knew what it was like to be short of money.
"I do not come to the position of leader of the Liberal Party from a lifetime of privilege," he said at his first press conference.
"I know what it's like to be very short of money. I know what it's like to live in rented flats.
"I know what it's like to grow up with a single parent with no support other than a devoted and loyal father.
"I know Australians are doing it tough and some Australians even in the years of greatest prosperity will always do it tough.
"We know that this is a tough world and our job as Liberals is to ensure that our society is a fair one. A society of opportunity. A society where people can, like my father and I, be able to take advantage of those opportunities, to seize those opportunities and with enterprise and energy and good luck and hard work, do well.
"We are a party of opportunity and this, my friends, is a land of opportunity."
Mr Turnbull, 53, a former merchant banker and republican campaigner, was today elected the 12th leader of the Liberal Party.
He praised Dr Nelson for leading the party through difficult and challenging times and said he was owed a debt of gratitude.
In his victory speech inside the Liberals' party room, Mr Turnbull spoke about freedom and praised new Liberal Senator Helen Kroger for mentioning it in her maiden speech in the Senate last night.
The Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, called on Mr Turnbull to support the push to make Australia a republic and said he looked forward to working with the new Liberal leader.
The Nationals leader, Warren Truss, congratulated Mr Turnbull.
"I am sure Mr Turnbull has the energy, determination and skills to be an effective leader of the Liberal Party," Mr Truss said.
Today's vote overturns the ballot that followed last November's federal election loss in which Dr Nelson beat Mr Turnbull by 45 votes to 42.
Mr Turnbull had been shadow treasurer and was the environment minister in the former Howard government.
There is speculation that Andrew Robb, the former party director and foreign affairs spokesman, could be promoted to the job of shadow treasurer.
Mr Turnbull said he would consult colleagues before announcing his new frontbench.
"I know I have the suppport of the entire party room,'' he said.
He offered Dr Nelson a position, but Dr Nelson said he wanted to go to the backbench.
Mr Turnbull said his wife Lucy and son Alex could not be in Canberra because "there wasn't much notice'' but his daughter Daisy was there.
"I want to say thank you to them. All my life I have been blessed with great family, whether it was the loyalty of my father in my youth or the love and the loyalty of my wife and my children today.''
"It is the love of our families that gives us the strength to serve the nation in the way we do.'
Media Man Australia Profiles
Malcolm Turnbull
"I do not come to the position of leader of the Liberal Party from a lifetime of privilege," he said at his first press conference.
"I know what it's like to be very short of money. I know what it's like to live in rented flats.
"I know what it's like to grow up with a single parent with no support other than a devoted and loyal father.
"I know Australians are doing it tough and some Australians even in the years of greatest prosperity will always do it tough.
"We know that this is a tough world and our job as Liberals is to ensure that our society is a fair one. A society of opportunity. A society where people can, like my father and I, be able to take advantage of those opportunities, to seize those opportunities and with enterprise and energy and good luck and hard work, do well.
"We are a party of opportunity and this, my friends, is a land of opportunity."
Mr Turnbull, 53, a former merchant banker and republican campaigner, was today elected the 12th leader of the Liberal Party.
He praised Dr Nelson for leading the party through difficult and challenging times and said he was owed a debt of gratitude.
In his victory speech inside the Liberals' party room, Mr Turnbull spoke about freedom and praised new Liberal Senator Helen Kroger for mentioning it in her maiden speech in the Senate last night.
The Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, called on Mr Turnbull to support the push to make Australia a republic and said he looked forward to working with the new Liberal leader.
The Nationals leader, Warren Truss, congratulated Mr Turnbull.
"I am sure Mr Turnbull has the energy, determination and skills to be an effective leader of the Liberal Party," Mr Truss said.
Today's vote overturns the ballot that followed last November's federal election loss in which Dr Nelson beat Mr Turnbull by 45 votes to 42.
Mr Turnbull had been shadow treasurer and was the environment minister in the former Howard government.
There is speculation that Andrew Robb, the former party director and foreign affairs spokesman, could be promoted to the job of shadow treasurer.
Mr Turnbull said he would consult colleagues before announcing his new frontbench.
"I know I have the suppport of the entire party room,'' he said.
He offered Dr Nelson a position, but Dr Nelson said he wanted to go to the backbench.
Mr Turnbull said his wife Lucy and son Alex could not be in Canberra because "there wasn't much notice'' but his daughter Daisy was there.
"I want to say thank you to them. All my life I have been blessed with great family, whether it was the loyalty of my father in my youth or the love and the loyalty of my wife and my children today.''
"It is the love of our families that gives us the strength to serve the nation in the way we do.'
Media Man Australia Profiles
Malcolm Turnbull
Turnbull: here's how I'd start to fix things, by Phillip Hudson - The Sydney Morning Herald - 16th September 2008
Malcolm Turnbull has used his first press conference as Liberal leader to accuse Kevin Rudd of policy recklessness and displaying a failure of economic leadership.
Mr Turnbull also said that, while Opposition policies would be under review, he would keep Brendan Nelson's plan to cut petrol excise by five cents a litre, oppose the Government's Medicare changes and maintain the policy on an emissions trading scheme.
He began the battle to claw back the Liberal's economic credentials by attacking Labor's claim to be fiscal kings.
He said the Government was not dealing well with the fallout from the economic crisis in America and the "massive collapse" on Wall Street.
"Labor claims to be superior economic managers. We are presently facing, probably, the gravest economic crisis globally in any of our lifetimes," Mr Turnbull said.
"We are seeing a collapse in global confidence. All year, from my very beginning as shadow treasurer, I have said to the Government their role is to lead.
"What Australia needs is real leadership. It needs strong leadership. It needs leaders that say this country is strong and can do anything. But we need confidence.
"We are suffering from a global collapse in confidence and instead of having a Government which talked up Australia, which spoke of our strengths, which spoke passionately about what we can do and why we are different, we've had a Government all year that's talked this country down."
He said that, when the subprime crisis started to hit and caused credit problems in Australia, the Treasurer, Wayne Swan, mismanaged the response.
"He begged the Reserve Bank to put up rates," Mr Turnbull said. "He created an environment where the Government of the day - and this is unique in the history of our country or indeed any country - exacerbated inflationary expectations. We have had a total failure of economic leadership in this country."
On emissions trading, Mr Turnbull said the Coalition's policy would remain to support a properly designed system to begin in 2011 or 2012.
"What we've seen from Kevin Rudd so far ... is an emissions trading scheme that will destroy Australian jobs. It will do economic harm with no environmental benefit," Mr Turnbull said.
He said the focus on the Liberals' position was "a little overdone" and what would matter was the position it took to the next election.
He said Mr Rudd was asking the public "to buy an emissions trading scheme without telling them what it will cost".
"Kevin Rudd is forming an emissions trading scheme for purely political grounds without knowing what will happen at the Copenhagen summit in 2009, without knowing what the new US president will do. It's an extraodinary act of political recklessness."
Mr Turnbull said the Liberals would stick with Dr Nelson's policy to cut petrol tax by five cents a litre - a policy he did not initially support.
He said the Liberals would also oppose the Government's Medicare levy surcharge changes, saying it was a Labor "act of retribution" designed to undermine the private health insurance industry and would most hurt those on lower incomes.
Media Man Australia Profiles
Malcolm Turnbull
Mr Turnbull also said that, while Opposition policies would be under review, he would keep Brendan Nelson's plan to cut petrol excise by five cents a litre, oppose the Government's Medicare changes and maintain the policy on an emissions trading scheme.
He began the battle to claw back the Liberal's economic credentials by attacking Labor's claim to be fiscal kings.
He said the Government was not dealing well with the fallout from the economic crisis in America and the "massive collapse" on Wall Street.
"Labor claims to be superior economic managers. We are presently facing, probably, the gravest economic crisis globally in any of our lifetimes," Mr Turnbull said.
"We are seeing a collapse in global confidence. All year, from my very beginning as shadow treasurer, I have said to the Government their role is to lead.
"What Australia needs is real leadership. It needs strong leadership. It needs leaders that say this country is strong and can do anything. But we need confidence.
"We are suffering from a global collapse in confidence and instead of having a Government which talked up Australia, which spoke of our strengths, which spoke passionately about what we can do and why we are different, we've had a Government all year that's talked this country down."
He said that, when the subprime crisis started to hit and caused credit problems in Australia, the Treasurer, Wayne Swan, mismanaged the response.
"He begged the Reserve Bank to put up rates," Mr Turnbull said. "He created an environment where the Government of the day - and this is unique in the history of our country or indeed any country - exacerbated inflationary expectations. We have had a total failure of economic leadership in this country."
On emissions trading, Mr Turnbull said the Coalition's policy would remain to support a properly designed system to begin in 2011 or 2012.
"What we've seen from Kevin Rudd so far ... is an emissions trading scheme that will destroy Australian jobs. It will do economic harm with no environmental benefit," Mr Turnbull said.
He said the focus on the Liberals' position was "a little overdone" and what would matter was the position it took to the next election.
He said Mr Rudd was asking the public "to buy an emissions trading scheme without telling them what it will cost".
"Kevin Rudd is forming an emissions trading scheme for purely political grounds without knowing what will happen at the Copenhagen summit in 2009, without knowing what the new US president will do. It's an extraodinary act of political recklessness."
Mr Turnbull said the Liberals would stick with Dr Nelson's policy to cut petrol tax by five cents a litre - a policy he did not initially support.
He said the Liberals would also oppose the Government's Medicare levy surcharge changes, saying it was a Labor "act of retribution" designed to undermine the private health insurance industry and would most hurt those on lower incomes.
Media Man Australia Profiles
Malcolm Turnbull
Saturday, September 13, 2008
Turnbull reins in before he reigns, by Glenn Milne - The Sunday Times - 12th September 2008
Malcolm Turnbull's decision to give Brendan Nelson's ailing leadership more time on the political respirator is the sign his wavering colleagues have been waiting for – the winds of political maturation.
Turnbull, the wealthiest man in the Federal Parliament, entered Liberal politics as a force of nature. The moment he seized the seat of Wentworth from sitting member Peter King in what became known as "the mother of all branch stacks", Turnbull was immediately regarded as the man most likely to succeed to the Liberal leadership.
This sense of manifest destiny was driven by a potent combination of personal fulfilment – a $170 million fortune amassed in the private sector – plus an ambition fired by an unerring sense of self-belief.
They are the positives in the Turnbull make-up. The overwhelming negative, though, was the way this blend of characteristics stoked his forces of impatience. Turnbull simply couldn't wait – for anybody or anything.
So he burst into the parliament and, as a backbencher, immediately commissioned – some would say bought – a suite of tax policies which, Peter Costello argues in his memoirs, conspired to undermine the Coalition's economic credentials.
Once inside Cabinet, he argued for the ratification of the Kyoto Protocols and then, according to Costello, leaked that fact during the election campaign to shore up his position in Greens-leaning, trendy Wentworth.
Then, when office was slipping from the Liberals' grasp in late 2007, it was Turnbull who turned on his political sponsor, John Howard, and told him he ought to go in the party's best interests. Ever since the defeat of November that year, and his narrowest of losses to Nelson in a subsequent leadership ballot, he's let anyone who cares to know that Nelson should move aside for him.
So, the news that with Costello apparently out of the way, Turnbull does not intend immediately throttling Nelson – which he could do – assumes the nature of a change in character.
The notion of Turnbull taking pause, rather than charging full tilt into the first available china shop, is a new and welcome development for those MPs still uncertain about whether to back him.
And it's welcome because it's smart. And like most pivotal moments in politics, it has, in fact, been some time in the making. In the past six months, even as Nelson has weakened, Turnbull has backed off his earlier, almost manic post-election agitation for a leadership change.
For his colleagues, that means their phones have stopped ringing off their hooks. Turnbull's interventions have been more subtle. He's become more collegiate; inviting MPs around to his parliamentary offices to discuss issues relevant to his shadow treasury portfolio. Which is most everything. Doing the mundane people work that Costello never did. But that Nelson always did.
Crucially, and again distinct from Costello, this has sent the message that he does not have a sense of leadership entitlement. A pause in campaigning against Nelson is not generosity on Turnbull's part, simply recognition that the opinion polls will do their work for him.
Ever since he assumed the leadership, Nelson has been able to argue that his inability to cut it with the Australian public has been due to the fact that Costello has been lingering over his shoulder as the putative Liberal leader. Now, all that's finished. Or has it? More of that later.
For the moment, let's assume that it's true. By giving Nelson space – and that means about two cycles of opinion polls – Turnbull will be able to argue that under no pressure from him and relieved of same from Costello, Nelson has still been unable to connect with the Australian public. Which, let's face it, decent bloke that Nelson is, was always going to be the case.
The point about Turnbull's discipline is twofold; it gives Nelson some dignity to resolve his fate on his own terms. And it gives Turnbull the lustre of restraint before striking.
Now, to return to Costello: A couple of observations, if I may, in the context of the Nelson vs Turnbull battle and Costello's apparent removal of himself from leadership contention.
Costello has steadfastly refused to say when he might leave the parliament. That means that for as long as his bum points south on a seat in the House of Representatives, he remains a viable leadership alternative. But – and this is critical – that viability now depends on how Turnbull fares when the inevitable leadership transition takes place.
The truth is that Costello's capacity to block Turnbull, the critic of his economic record, is now at an all-time low. Key former Costello supporters have now switched to Turnbull.
I ask them: "If Turnbull mounts a challenge and Costello rings to say, `Don't do it', what would be your response?"
They say: "Peter has now dealt himself out of the party's future, therefore he has no say in it. We will make up our own minds."
All roads point to Turnbull.
(Credit: The Sunday Times)
Media Man Australia Profiles
Malcolm Turnbull
Turnbull, the wealthiest man in the Federal Parliament, entered Liberal politics as a force of nature. The moment he seized the seat of Wentworth from sitting member Peter King in what became known as "the mother of all branch stacks", Turnbull was immediately regarded as the man most likely to succeed to the Liberal leadership.
This sense of manifest destiny was driven by a potent combination of personal fulfilment – a $170 million fortune amassed in the private sector – plus an ambition fired by an unerring sense of self-belief.
They are the positives in the Turnbull make-up. The overwhelming negative, though, was the way this blend of characteristics stoked his forces of impatience. Turnbull simply couldn't wait – for anybody or anything.
So he burst into the parliament and, as a backbencher, immediately commissioned – some would say bought – a suite of tax policies which, Peter Costello argues in his memoirs, conspired to undermine the Coalition's economic credentials.
Once inside Cabinet, he argued for the ratification of the Kyoto Protocols and then, according to Costello, leaked that fact during the election campaign to shore up his position in Greens-leaning, trendy Wentworth.
Then, when office was slipping from the Liberals' grasp in late 2007, it was Turnbull who turned on his political sponsor, John Howard, and told him he ought to go in the party's best interests. Ever since the defeat of November that year, and his narrowest of losses to Nelson in a subsequent leadership ballot, he's let anyone who cares to know that Nelson should move aside for him.
So, the news that with Costello apparently out of the way, Turnbull does not intend immediately throttling Nelson – which he could do – assumes the nature of a change in character.
The notion of Turnbull taking pause, rather than charging full tilt into the first available china shop, is a new and welcome development for those MPs still uncertain about whether to back him.
And it's welcome because it's smart. And like most pivotal moments in politics, it has, in fact, been some time in the making. In the past six months, even as Nelson has weakened, Turnbull has backed off his earlier, almost manic post-election agitation for a leadership change.
For his colleagues, that means their phones have stopped ringing off their hooks. Turnbull's interventions have been more subtle. He's become more collegiate; inviting MPs around to his parliamentary offices to discuss issues relevant to his shadow treasury portfolio. Which is most everything. Doing the mundane people work that Costello never did. But that Nelson always did.
Crucially, and again distinct from Costello, this has sent the message that he does not have a sense of leadership entitlement. A pause in campaigning against Nelson is not generosity on Turnbull's part, simply recognition that the opinion polls will do their work for him.
Ever since he assumed the leadership, Nelson has been able to argue that his inability to cut it with the Australian public has been due to the fact that Costello has been lingering over his shoulder as the putative Liberal leader. Now, all that's finished. Or has it? More of that later.
For the moment, let's assume that it's true. By giving Nelson space – and that means about two cycles of opinion polls – Turnbull will be able to argue that under no pressure from him and relieved of same from Costello, Nelson has still been unable to connect with the Australian public. Which, let's face it, decent bloke that Nelson is, was always going to be the case.
The point about Turnbull's discipline is twofold; it gives Nelson some dignity to resolve his fate on his own terms. And it gives Turnbull the lustre of restraint before striking.
Now, to return to Costello: A couple of observations, if I may, in the context of the Nelson vs Turnbull battle and Costello's apparent removal of himself from leadership contention.
Costello has steadfastly refused to say when he might leave the parliament. That means that for as long as his bum points south on a seat in the House of Representatives, he remains a viable leadership alternative. But – and this is critical – that viability now depends on how Turnbull fares when the inevitable leadership transition takes place.
The truth is that Costello's capacity to block Turnbull, the critic of his economic record, is now at an all-time low. Key former Costello supporters have now switched to Turnbull.
I ask them: "If Turnbull mounts a challenge and Costello rings to say, `Don't do it', what would be your response?"
They say: "Peter has now dealt himself out of the party's future, therefore he has no say in it. We will make up our own minds."
All roads point to Turnbull.
(Credit: The Sunday Times)
Media Man Australia Profiles
Malcolm Turnbull
Tuesday, September 09, 2008
Greens' recount doubles value of gifts to Labor, by Wendy Frew and Jano Gibson - The Sydney Morning Herald - 8th Septemeber 2008
The political donations tap remains turned to full bore in NSW, with the state Labor Party raising $9.5 million in the 14 months to June, more than double the amount first reported by the media when Electoral Funding Authority data was released last week.
Much of the money has come from companies seeking State Government approval for controversial housing projects or lucrative gaming licences, such as Rosecorp's luxury apartments at Catherine Hill Bay and Star City Casino's exclusive licence renewal.
The release of the data follows a Galaxy poll conducted last week on behalf of the Greens that found 82 per cent of respondents favoured a ban on developer donations.
When the authority released donor declarations on Wednesday, it was first thought the ALP had raised only $4.3 million. A closer examination by the Greens showed the party's coffers had received more than twice that amount, and that donations were running more than $100,000 a month ahead of fund-raising efforts in previous years.
The party's NSW branch declined to comment on the donations.
Some of Labor's biggest donations came from key players fighting for the right to operate casinos in NSW.
In October Tabcorp, the owner of Star City Casino, had its exclusive casino licence renewed for another 12 years. Three weeks after the deal was secured, Star City gave Labor a cheque for $112,200.
A Hong Kong billionaire, Stanley Ho, who was believed to have been lobbying the then premier, Morris Iemma, for a second casino licence, donated $200,000 to Labor. Anthony Chan, who has the same Hong Kong address as Mr Ho, gave Labor $100,000.
A controversial proposal from Rosecorp to build hundreds of apartments in the hamlet of Catherine Hill Bay, on the Central Coast, was approved last week by the then minister for planning, Frank Sartor. In the 14 months to June, Rosecorp - a generous donor of long standing - donated another $117,700 to the state Labor Party.
In October Mr Sartor took control of Johnson Property Group's $650 million housing project at Cooranbong, near Lake Macquarie, from the council. In the 14 months to June, this year, the company donated $140,150 to the ALP.
The minister is also the consent authority for the company's proposal to build a satellite suburb at Pitt Town, 60 kilometres north-west of Sydney, and its proposed redevelopment of the 60-hectare Sydney Adventist Hospital site in Wahroonga.
Duncan Hardie, of Hardie Holdings, had donated an estimated $455,000 to the state ALP, starting in 2001. He topped that up with $100,000 in July last year. Mr Hardie has received favourable treatment in the Government's housing strategies for the Lower Hunter and the Mid-North Coast.
Between them, ClubsNSW and the Australian Hotels Association donated $239,350 in the 14-month period.
V8 Supercars Australia, which despite widespread community and business opposition is set to get approval from the State Government to turn Olympic Park into a street-car racetrack, donated $15,000 to the ALP.
In the months before last year's federal election two dinners at which the then federal Opposition leader Kevin Rudd was the star attraction yielded a war chest of $751,638 for NSW Labor.
Mr Iemma and senior state ministers hosted a series of "intimate dinners" that generated more than $120,000.
One of the four functions, involving Mr Iemma and the then treasurer, Michael Costa, on July 18 last year, raised $65,000. Among the 10 organisations that paid to attend were Star City Pty Ltd and ClubsNSW.
Two days earlier a dinner at which Mr Sartor was the attraction brought in $30,000. Paying for the privilege of dining with Mr Sartor were representatives from 11 companies, including The Village Building Co.
Three months before Mr Sartor had controversially rejected the advice of an expert panel and approved the rezoning of land owned by Village under a Canberra Airport flight path. (Credit: Fairfax)
Media Man Australia Profiles
Politics
Much of the money has come from companies seeking State Government approval for controversial housing projects or lucrative gaming licences, such as Rosecorp's luxury apartments at Catherine Hill Bay and Star City Casino's exclusive licence renewal.
The release of the data follows a Galaxy poll conducted last week on behalf of the Greens that found 82 per cent of respondents favoured a ban on developer donations.
When the authority released donor declarations on Wednesday, it was first thought the ALP had raised only $4.3 million. A closer examination by the Greens showed the party's coffers had received more than twice that amount, and that donations were running more than $100,000 a month ahead of fund-raising efforts in previous years.
The party's NSW branch declined to comment on the donations.
Some of Labor's biggest donations came from key players fighting for the right to operate casinos in NSW.
In October Tabcorp, the owner of Star City Casino, had its exclusive casino licence renewed for another 12 years. Three weeks after the deal was secured, Star City gave Labor a cheque for $112,200.
A Hong Kong billionaire, Stanley Ho, who was believed to have been lobbying the then premier, Morris Iemma, for a second casino licence, donated $200,000 to Labor. Anthony Chan, who has the same Hong Kong address as Mr Ho, gave Labor $100,000.
A controversial proposal from Rosecorp to build hundreds of apartments in the hamlet of Catherine Hill Bay, on the Central Coast, was approved last week by the then minister for planning, Frank Sartor. In the 14 months to June, Rosecorp - a generous donor of long standing - donated another $117,700 to the state Labor Party.
In October Mr Sartor took control of Johnson Property Group's $650 million housing project at Cooranbong, near Lake Macquarie, from the council. In the 14 months to June, this year, the company donated $140,150 to the ALP.
The minister is also the consent authority for the company's proposal to build a satellite suburb at Pitt Town, 60 kilometres north-west of Sydney, and its proposed redevelopment of the 60-hectare Sydney Adventist Hospital site in Wahroonga.
Duncan Hardie, of Hardie Holdings, had donated an estimated $455,000 to the state ALP, starting in 2001. He topped that up with $100,000 in July last year. Mr Hardie has received favourable treatment in the Government's housing strategies for the Lower Hunter and the Mid-North Coast.
Between them, ClubsNSW and the Australian Hotels Association donated $239,350 in the 14-month period.
V8 Supercars Australia, which despite widespread community and business opposition is set to get approval from the State Government to turn Olympic Park into a street-car racetrack, donated $15,000 to the ALP.
In the months before last year's federal election two dinners at which the then federal Opposition leader Kevin Rudd was the star attraction yielded a war chest of $751,638 for NSW Labor.
Mr Iemma and senior state ministers hosted a series of "intimate dinners" that generated more than $120,000.
One of the four functions, involving Mr Iemma and the then treasurer, Michael Costa, on July 18 last year, raised $65,000. Among the 10 organisations that paid to attend were Star City Pty Ltd and ClubsNSW.
Two days earlier a dinner at which Mr Sartor was the attraction brought in $30,000. Paying for the privilege of dining with Mr Sartor were representatives from 11 companies, including The Village Building Co.
Three months before Mr Sartor had controversially rejected the advice of an expert panel and approved the rezoning of land owned by Village under a Canberra Airport flight path. (Credit: Fairfax)
Media Man Australia Profiles
Politics
Saturday, August 23, 2008
"MY BRILLIANT CAREER" – ABC TV 4 CORNERS MONDAY - 25th AUGUST 2008
Next on Four Corners: A profile of Liberal leader-in-waiting, Malcolm Turnbull… his brilliance, his brashness and his baggage.
"People either love or loathe Turnbull."
Barring a stunning rebound by Brendan Nelson or a deft backflip by Peter Costello, there's a fair chance that Australia's alternative prime minister at the next election will be Malcolm Bligh Turnbull.
"Malcolm is one of those people who seem destined for great things."
Will voters embrace the wealthiest politician in Parliament? What strengths do colleagues see in him? And why do some of them fear his leadership may be combustible?
"Malcolm is a bit of a volcano."... "When you're on the wrong side of Malcolm, it's terrifying."
In this unauthorised profile, Four Corners hands the microphone to allies and adversaries who have seen the very best and very worst of Malcolm Turnbull at close range. Four Corners explores Turnbull's meteoric career and tempestuous character to gain a glimpse of the promise and pitfalls of a Turnbull leadership.
"Malcolm Turnbull is clearly a person of great ability."
Reporter Sarah Ferguson charts Turnbull's arrival as the bold young lawyer who rattled the British Establishment in the Spycatcher case. She throws new light on Turnbull's role in the bitter tussle for control of the Fairfax media empire, solving the lingering mystery of how Kerry Packer's bid for control of the Fairfax media empire was finally scuttled.
"... impetuous and unpredictable…"
Turnbull's eventual split from his mentor Packer would not alter his trajectory. Nor would a spectacular failure at the republic referendum - despite prompting early questions about his political judgment - and another falling out with a powerful figure, this time Prime Minister John Howard.
"He has a certain star quality." ... "His judgment was clearly appalling."
But there's a faint ticking in the background which could turn out to be a time-bomb. Four years after his entry to Parliament, questions continue to be asked about the baggage he carries from his earlier business life. Are the coalition – and the country – ready for Malcolm Turnbull? It's all part of "My Brilliant Career" – on Four Corners 8.30 pm, Monday 25 August and 11.35 pm Tuesday 26 August on ABC1, and also 8am Tuesday on ABC2.
WATCH A PROMO ONLINE NOW!
Media Man Australia Profiles
Malcolm Turnbull
"People either love or loathe Turnbull."
Barring a stunning rebound by Brendan Nelson or a deft backflip by Peter Costello, there's a fair chance that Australia's alternative prime minister at the next election will be Malcolm Bligh Turnbull.
"Malcolm is one of those people who seem destined for great things."
Will voters embrace the wealthiest politician in Parliament? What strengths do colleagues see in him? And why do some of them fear his leadership may be combustible?
"Malcolm is a bit of a volcano."... "When you're on the wrong side of Malcolm, it's terrifying."
In this unauthorised profile, Four Corners hands the microphone to allies and adversaries who have seen the very best and very worst of Malcolm Turnbull at close range. Four Corners explores Turnbull's meteoric career and tempestuous character to gain a glimpse of the promise and pitfalls of a Turnbull leadership.
"Malcolm Turnbull is clearly a person of great ability."
Reporter Sarah Ferguson charts Turnbull's arrival as the bold young lawyer who rattled the British Establishment in the Spycatcher case. She throws new light on Turnbull's role in the bitter tussle for control of the Fairfax media empire, solving the lingering mystery of how Kerry Packer's bid for control of the Fairfax media empire was finally scuttled.
"... impetuous and unpredictable…"
Turnbull's eventual split from his mentor Packer would not alter his trajectory. Nor would a spectacular failure at the republic referendum - despite prompting early questions about his political judgment - and another falling out with a powerful figure, this time Prime Minister John Howard.
"He has a certain star quality." ... "His judgment was clearly appalling."
But there's a faint ticking in the background which could turn out to be a time-bomb. Four years after his entry to Parliament, questions continue to be asked about the baggage he carries from his earlier business life. Are the coalition – and the country – ready for Malcolm Turnbull? It's all part of "My Brilliant Career" – on Four Corners 8.30 pm, Monday 25 August and 11.35 pm Tuesday 26 August on ABC1, and also 8am Tuesday on ABC2.
WATCH A PROMO ONLINE NOW!
Media Man Australia Profiles
Malcolm Turnbull
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
Greens to lead on climate change: Brown - The Age - 12th July 2008
Greens leader Bob Brown says his party will lead the national parliamentary debate on climate change, pushing for tougher cuts in emissions and massive funding for public transport.
Addressing the Australian Greens national Council meeting in Hobart, Senator Brown said Prime Minister Kevin Rudd will have failed to show mature leadership if Labor sets weak targets for emissions cuts or if it delayed implementation of an emissions trading scheme to 2012.
He said the Greens wanted a 40 per cent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions below 1990 levels by 2020 and a carbon neutral Australia, or at least 90 per cent reduction, by 2050.
As well, the Greens want massive funding for fast, reliable and cheap public transport in metropolitan and regional Australia.
Senator Brown called for an end to logging and burning of native forests and woodlands to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The Greens are also calling for feed-in laws, paying a premium to those who feed solar or other renewable energy back into the electricity grid.
"We will use the balance of power to make the Senate a house of innovation to produce better outcomes for all Australians," he said.
Senator Brown welcomed new Greens senators Scott Ludlam (WA) and Sarah Hanson-Young (SA) to the team.
Both were elected last year, giving the Greens five Senate places and the balance of power in some circumstances.
To pass any measure opposed by the Opposition, Labor will need to negotiate the support of Greens and minor party senators.
Media Man Australia Profiles
Bob Brown
Politics
Addressing the Australian Greens national Council meeting in Hobart, Senator Brown said Prime Minister Kevin Rudd will have failed to show mature leadership if Labor sets weak targets for emissions cuts or if it delayed implementation of an emissions trading scheme to 2012.
He said the Greens wanted a 40 per cent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions below 1990 levels by 2020 and a carbon neutral Australia, or at least 90 per cent reduction, by 2050.
As well, the Greens want massive funding for fast, reliable and cheap public transport in metropolitan and regional Australia.
Senator Brown called for an end to logging and burning of native forests and woodlands to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The Greens are also calling for feed-in laws, paying a premium to those who feed solar or other renewable energy back into the electricity grid.
"We will use the balance of power to make the Senate a house of innovation to produce better outcomes for all Australians," he said.
Senator Brown welcomed new Greens senators Scott Ludlam (WA) and Sarah Hanson-Young (SA) to the team.
Both were elected last year, giving the Greens five Senate places and the balance of power in some circumstances.
To pass any measure opposed by the Opposition, Labor will need to negotiate the support of Greens and minor party senators.
Media Man Australia Profiles
Bob Brown
Politics
Jesse Ventura Will Not Seek Minnesota Senate Seat - ABC News - 14th July 2008
ABC News' Tahman Bradley Reports: In an extremely anxious moment built up by delaying the big moment for 12 minutes, and after a week of intense guessing about his intentions, Jesse Ventura announced tonight on CNN that he has decided not to run for the U.S. Senate in Minnesota this year.
"I've decided not to run," Ventura told Larry King, though he left the door cracked that he could become motivated to enter the race by tomorrow's 5 p.m. filing deadline if an act of God were to occur.
Ventura said he thought long and hard about whether he wanted to subject his family to the scrutiny of a campaign and ultimately decided against running.
Even without the race's second celebrity, the Minnesota Senate contest has become a contentious and expensive battle that will likely gain major media attention this fall. Incumbent Republican Norm Coleman is being challenged by former "Saturday Night Live" comedian, Democrat Al Franken -- and Mr. Coleman is in trouble.
Minnesota has been trending toward the Democrats. Residents are angry with President Bush and Republicans in Congress and Coleman has felt the heat. His approval rating has fallen below 50 percent. Right now, Coleman holds a 10 point edge over Franken, *according to a poll conducted last month*, but polls on the presidential level show Democrat Barack Obama leading McCain by double digits in Minnesota -- and that enthusiasm for Obama might carry over and affect the Senate race.
Coleman filed his candidacy for reelection today and released an atypical commercial touting his accomplishments in the Senate. Coleman knows a traditional unsuccessful incumbent message will not be successful with the environment for Republicans being the way it is. In the ad, Coleman reaches back in a funny way to remind voters that while mayor of Saint Paul, he pushed to bring a professional hockey team to the city in 2000. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_hvPbW0jsw
Coleman has the early fundraising edge having brought in $15.4 million to Franken's $11.5 million in what could be the most expensive Senate contest this year.
Minnesota may not be the center of the political universe, but it will be in the spotlight in a unique way this fall with the honor of hosting the GOP convention and the possibility that the top Republican in the state, Gov. Tim Pawlenty, may be selected as Sen. John McCain's running-mate.
Franken was knocked off message a bit after it was reveled the former humorist's companies owed $70,000 in back taxes in 17 states. Republicans point to that problem as a sign Franken's not serious. Coleman has been dealing with the revelation that he rents a room in Capitol Hill townhome owned by a well-connect GOP corporate consultant for only $600 per month. Democrats argue that rental arrangement proves Coleman is too cozy with powerful interests.
Media Man Australia Profiles
Jesse Ventura
Politics
"I've decided not to run," Ventura told Larry King, though he left the door cracked that he could become motivated to enter the race by tomorrow's 5 p.m. filing deadline if an act of God were to occur.
Ventura said he thought long and hard about whether he wanted to subject his family to the scrutiny of a campaign and ultimately decided against running.
Even without the race's second celebrity, the Minnesota Senate contest has become a contentious and expensive battle that will likely gain major media attention this fall. Incumbent Republican Norm Coleman is being challenged by former "Saturday Night Live" comedian, Democrat Al Franken -- and Mr. Coleman is in trouble.
Minnesota has been trending toward the Democrats. Residents are angry with President Bush and Republicans in Congress and Coleman has felt the heat. His approval rating has fallen below 50 percent. Right now, Coleman holds a 10 point edge over Franken, *according to a poll conducted last month*, but polls on the presidential level show Democrat Barack Obama leading McCain by double digits in Minnesota -- and that enthusiasm for Obama might carry over and affect the Senate race.
Coleman filed his candidacy for reelection today and released an atypical commercial touting his accomplishments in the Senate. Coleman knows a traditional unsuccessful incumbent message will not be successful with the environment for Republicans being the way it is. In the ad, Coleman reaches back in a funny way to remind voters that while mayor of Saint Paul, he pushed to bring a professional hockey team to the city in 2000. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_hvPbW0jsw
Coleman has the early fundraising edge having brought in $15.4 million to Franken's $11.5 million in what could be the most expensive Senate contest this year.
Minnesota may not be the center of the political universe, but it will be in the spotlight in a unique way this fall with the honor of hosting the GOP convention and the possibility that the top Republican in the state, Gov. Tim Pawlenty, may be selected as Sen. John McCain's running-mate.
Franken was knocked off message a bit after it was reveled the former humorist's companies owed $70,000 in back taxes in 17 states. Republicans point to that problem as a sign Franken's not serious. Coleman has been dealing with the revelation that he rents a room in Capitol Hill townhome owned by a well-connect GOP corporate consultant for only $600 per month. Democrats argue that rental arrangement proves Coleman is too cozy with powerful interests.
Media Man Australia Profiles
Jesse Ventura
Politics
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
My endorsement
Dear Greg,
A few hours from now I will step on stage in Detroit, Michigan to announce my support for Senator Barack Obama. From now through Election Day, I intend to do whatever I can to make sure he is elected President of the United States.
Over the next four years, we are going to face many difficult challenges -- including bringing our troops home from Iraq, fixing our economy, and solving the climate crisis. Barack Obama is clearly the candidate best able to solve these problems and bring change to America.
I've never asked members of AlGore.com to contribute to a political campaign before, but this moment and this election are too important to let pass without taking action.
That's why I am asking you to join me today in showing your support for Barack Obama by making a contribution to his campaign today:
https://donate.barackobama.com/support
Over the past 18 months, Barack Obama has united a movement. He knows change does not come from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue or Capitol Hill. It begins when people stand up and take action.
With the help of millions of supporters like you, Barack Obama will bring the change we so desperately need in order to solve our country's most pressing problems.
If you've already contributed to Barack Obama's campaign, I ask that you consider making another contribution. If you haven't, please join the movement right now:
https://donate.barackobama.com/support
On the issues that matter most, Barack Obama is clearly the right choice to lead our nation.
We have a lot of work to do in the next few months to elect Barack Obama president and it begins by making a contribution to his campaign today.
Thank you,
Al Gore
LIVE TONIGHT -- 8:30 p.m. EDT: Watch streaming video of Al Gore and Barack Obama at a rally in Detroit, Michigan:
http://www.BarackObama.com
Media Man Australia Profiles
Politics
A few hours from now I will step on stage in Detroit, Michigan to announce my support for Senator Barack Obama. From now through Election Day, I intend to do whatever I can to make sure he is elected President of the United States.
Over the next four years, we are going to face many difficult challenges -- including bringing our troops home from Iraq, fixing our economy, and solving the climate crisis. Barack Obama is clearly the candidate best able to solve these problems and bring change to America.
I've never asked members of AlGore.com to contribute to a political campaign before, but this moment and this election are too important to let pass without taking action.
That's why I am asking you to join me today in showing your support for Barack Obama by making a contribution to his campaign today:
https://donate.barackobama.com/support
Over the past 18 months, Barack Obama has united a movement. He knows change does not come from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue or Capitol Hill. It begins when people stand up and take action.
With the help of millions of supporters like you, Barack Obama will bring the change we so desperately need in order to solve our country's most pressing problems.
If you've already contributed to Barack Obama's campaign, I ask that you consider making another contribution. If you haven't, please join the movement right now:
https://donate.barackobama.com/support
On the issues that matter most, Barack Obama is clearly the right choice to lead our nation.
We have a lot of work to do in the next few months to elect Barack Obama president and it begins by making a contribution to his campaign today.
Thank you,
Al Gore
LIVE TONIGHT -- 8:30 p.m. EDT: Watch streaming video of Al Gore and Barack Obama at a rally in Detroit, Michigan:
http://www.BarackObama.com
Media Man Australia Profiles
Politics
Sunday, May 18, 2008
War of the worlds on Bondi Beach, by Kerry-Anne Walsh - The Sun-Herald - 18th May 2008
Anthony Albanese is a proud Housing Commission westie, Malcolm Turnbull a passionate lifelong resident of the blue-blood eastern suburbs.
In a furious budget fallout, the Labor and Liberal heavyweights are locked in an angry stoush laden with class warfare overtones. At stake is the historic North Bondi Surf Life Saving Club, which looks after tens of millions of international visitors a year.
Mr Albanese, the Regional Development Minister, yanked more than $2 million for projects in Bondi when he cancelled the regional partnerships program in the budget. The lion's share of the funding was for an urgently needed $1.7 million redevelopment of the surf life saving club.
This prompted a seething Mr Turnbull, the shadow treasurer whose electorate of Wentworth embraces Bondi, to declare to The Sun-Herald yesterday: "Mr Albanese has declared war on Bondi Beach.
"This is an incredible act of bastardry. It is all about the politics of envy - that's their [the Government's] strategy. But this has never been known as a silvertail suburb. It belongs to the whole of Sydney, the whole of Australia."
He said Mr Albanese had singled out Bondi for a vicious attack, even though Environment Minister Peter Garrett had recently heritage-listed 65hectares of the beach precinct.
Mr Albanese fumed back yesterday: "Bondi should find itself a local member who can deliver on grants.
"Malcolm could find the time [in government] to organise $10 million for crazy cloud-seeding propositions but couldn't find the time to properly deliver the grant that he promised."
Mr Turnbull retaliated that the club had been engaging architects, raising extra money and getting planning approval since the grant was approved last June. "The club has relied on the integrity of the Government to deliver, and that integrity has been shattered by the cynical Mr Albanese," he said. "It is all about punishing Bondi because it is in my seat of Wentworth."
Mr Turnbull said there was no way the club, the largest of its type in the country, could now go ahead with the redevelopment, which would have upgraded training and patrolling facilities.
The redevelopment was desperately needed to meet the demands of the popular tourist site. Nearly 80 million visitors a year flock to Bondi and the club had not been upgraded in decades.
The State Government and Labor-dominated Waverley Council had backed the project with $500,000 each. Individuals contributed another $300,000, including Mr Turnbull and his wife Lucy, who shelled out $100,000.
Mr Albanese cancelled the regional partnerships program because of a string of questionable regional grants made by the Howard government. "It is unfortunate that projects have been sacrificed by the Coalition's rorting of the scheme, which made its future untenable," he said.
Media Man Australia Profiles
Malcolm Turnbull
Bondi Beach
Politics
In a furious budget fallout, the Labor and Liberal heavyweights are locked in an angry stoush laden with class warfare overtones. At stake is the historic North Bondi Surf Life Saving Club, which looks after tens of millions of international visitors a year.
Mr Albanese, the Regional Development Minister, yanked more than $2 million for projects in Bondi when he cancelled the regional partnerships program in the budget. The lion's share of the funding was for an urgently needed $1.7 million redevelopment of the surf life saving club.
This prompted a seething Mr Turnbull, the shadow treasurer whose electorate of Wentworth embraces Bondi, to declare to The Sun-Herald yesterday: "Mr Albanese has declared war on Bondi Beach.
"This is an incredible act of bastardry. It is all about the politics of envy - that's their [the Government's] strategy. But this has never been known as a silvertail suburb. It belongs to the whole of Sydney, the whole of Australia."
He said Mr Albanese had singled out Bondi for a vicious attack, even though Environment Minister Peter Garrett had recently heritage-listed 65hectares of the beach precinct.
Mr Albanese fumed back yesterday: "Bondi should find itself a local member who can deliver on grants.
"Malcolm could find the time [in government] to organise $10 million for crazy cloud-seeding propositions but couldn't find the time to properly deliver the grant that he promised."
Mr Turnbull retaliated that the club had been engaging architects, raising extra money and getting planning approval since the grant was approved last June. "The club has relied on the integrity of the Government to deliver, and that integrity has been shattered by the cynical Mr Albanese," he said. "It is all about punishing Bondi because it is in my seat of Wentworth."
Mr Turnbull said there was no way the club, the largest of its type in the country, could now go ahead with the redevelopment, which would have upgraded training and patrolling facilities.
The redevelopment was desperately needed to meet the demands of the popular tourist site. Nearly 80 million visitors a year flock to Bondi and the club had not been upgraded in decades.
The State Government and Labor-dominated Waverley Council had backed the project with $500,000 each. Individuals contributed another $300,000, including Mr Turnbull and his wife Lucy, who shelled out $100,000.
Mr Albanese cancelled the regional partnerships program because of a string of questionable regional grants made by the Howard government. "It is unfortunate that projects have been sacrificed by the Coalition's rorting of the scheme, which made its future untenable," he said.
Media Man Australia Profiles
Malcolm Turnbull
Bondi Beach
Politics
Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Australian Government AusAID Media Release - 13th May 2008
THE HON STEPHEN SMITH MP, MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS, THE HON DUNCAN KERR SC MP, PARLIAMENTARY SECRETARY FOR PACIFIC ISLAND AFFAIRS AND THE HON BOB MCMULLAN MP, PARLIAMENTARY SECRETARY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE
AA0838
13 May 2008
2008-09 International Development Assistance Budget
The 2008-09 Budget lays the foundation for implementing the Government's long-term commitment to increase Australia's Official Development Assistance (ODA) to 0.5 per cent of Gross National Income (GNI) by 2015-16.
Australia will provide an estimated $3.7 billion in ODA in 2008-09, increasing Australia's ratio of ODA to GNI from 0.30 per cent in 2007-08 to 0.32 per cent in 2008-09. The Government expects to increase Australia's ODA to levels equivalent to 0.35 per cent of GNI in 2009-10, 0.37 per cent of GNI in 2010-11 and 0.38 per cent of GNI in 2011-12.
The new measures contained in this Budget give effect to the Government's election commitments to address climate change adaptation needs, establish Australian leadership on disability and eliminating avoidable blindness and improve access to clean water and sanitation.
The 2008-09 Budget increases the focus of the program on practical development outcomes, promoting faster progress towards the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and greater attention to alleviating the situation of the vulnerable.
In 2008-09 Australia will scale up expenditure in major sectors influencing MDG outcomes, including education (up 5 per cent), health (up 8 per cent), rural development (up 7 per cent), environment (up 7 per cent) and infrastructure (up 17 per cent). Assistance to help the most vulnerable, particularly those who suffer disability or who are refugees or victims of humanitarian crisis, will also increase.
Budget Highlights
Making faster progress towards the MDGs
The Australian Government is committed to helping developing country partners attain the MDGs. Most developing countries in the Asia-Pacific region can claim progress in meeting some of the MDGs, however, none is on course to achieve them all. Making faster progress on the MDGs requires a concerted and well-coordinated global response.
Australia's development assistance helps partners expand economic activity to create jobs and raise incomes, combat disease and improve nutrition, raise basic educational attainment, and improve the responsiveness and accountability of the state in meeting citizens' basic needs.
The Government will increase Australia's multilateral engagement, through increased multilateral development financing and a major increase of $200 million over four years in Australia's core funding for key UN agencies leading efforts to achieve the MDGs.
New multi-year allocations are made to improve access to clean water and basic sanitation ($300 million over three years) and to meet high priority climate adaptation needs in vulnerable countries ($150 million over three years), implementing the election commitments made by the Government.
Priority will be given to helping the Pacific and Papua New Guinea achieve the MDGs through expanded assistance in 2008-09. New programs focusing on infrastructure development, land administration and public sector capacity building will contribute to the Pacific Partnerships for Development outlined in the Prime Minister's March 2008 Port Moresby Declaration. The partnerships will provide a new framework for Australia and the Pacific island nations to commit jointly to achieving improved development outcomes, on the basis of mutual respect and mutual responsibility.
Addressing the needs of the vulnerable
Action to address disadvantage and vulnerability is essential to alleviating poverty in our region. The most vulnerable include those who suffer disability or who are refugees or victims of humanitarian crisis. They are cut off from access to basic services and the opportunity to improve their quality of life.
A significant scaling up in assistance for some of the most vulnerable - those suffering avoidable blindness and people with disabilities - will commence in 2008-09, piloting approaches to better eye and vision care and developing a strategy for addressing disability needs through the development assistance program.
Increasing assistance will be provided to new partners including Iraq and Afghanistan in transition from conflict. Increased assistance will support vulnerable civilian populations and help underpin reconstruction.
Further details on development assistance initiatives in the 2008-09 Budget are provided below.
Access to Clean Water and Effective Sanitation
Australia will invest $300 million over three years, with $8 million in 2008-09, to address the critical challenge to health and wellbeing posed by inadequate access to clean water and sanitation.
This initiative will improve access for the poor to clean water and effective sanitation in urban, peri-urban and rural areas and provide more predictable water supply by protecting fresh water sources. Better management of water resources and improved sanitation will reduce the transmission of disease and lead to improved health for poor people, particularly women and children.
Adaptation to Climate Change
Australia will invest $150 million over three years, with $35 million in 2008‑09, to meet urgent climate change adaptation needs in vulnerable countries in Australia's region.
Funding will support improved scientific information on climate change impacts, more effective strategic planning and vulnerability assessments and the implementation of high priority adaptation measures, for example, by better protecting infrastructure from extreme weather events and securing fresh water supplies. Funding will increase planning and investment in responses that reduce the vulnerability of communities. Support will address specific country and regional needs, for example, better management of the Mekong river basin, better urban planning in the mega-cities of Asia, and measuring sea level change, modelling sea inundation and assessing coastal vulnerability in Pacific island states.
Fighting Avoidable Blindness
Australia will invest $45 million over two years on meetings its election commitment to help eliminate avoidable blindness in the region and on establishing a comprehensive strategy for addressing disability in partner developing countries.
Most funding will be used to support a pilot eye and vision care program to address blindness and vision impairment, including by expanding the number of qualified eye health workers.
UN Partnership for MDGs
Australia will invest an additional $200 million over four years to strengthen partnerships with key United Nations development agencies.
Australian development assistance will boost the capacity of UNICEF, WHO, UNFPA, UNIFEM, UNDP, UNOCHA, and UNAIDS to lead global efforts to realise the Millennium Development Goals. Core funding for these organisations enable Australia to contribute to work on issues as diverse as increasing child literacy, improving maternal and child health and the empowerment of women in countries beyond our own region.
Pacific Land Program
Australia will invest $54 million over four years, with $6.5 million in 2008‑09, to protect customary land rights, promote economic and social development, and reduce the potential for instability through land-related conflict in the Pacific.
Assistance will support partner government‑led improvements in land administration. Australian funding will help address the challenges to land use and ownership from urbanisation. Clarification of land title is a key prerequisite for private investment. Funding will also improve the skills of professionals and semi‑professionals in areas such as planning, surveying and valuing.
Pacific Regional Infrastructure Facility
Australia will invest $127 million over four years, with $5.5 million in 2008-09, to improve basic infrastructure services in the Pacific.
Targeted support to Pacific island nations will address local constraints to growth and challenges to nation building and stability. Australian funding for improved infrastructure services in both rural and urban areas including transport, water, sanitation, waste management, energy and communications will facilitate growth and enable more Pacific islanders to participate in the development process.
Investing in Pacific Public Sector Capacity
Australia will invest $107 million over four years, with $6 million in 2008-09, to strengthen public sector administration in the Pacific.
Funding will improve public sector performance by supporting management and policy reform, while also providing immediate assistance to improve individual and institutional capacity in priority areas as identified by partner governments in the region. The inititive will address a key impediment to poverty reduction, by helping to improve service delivery and enable growth.
Afghanistan Humanitarian and Reconstruction Assistance
Australia will contribute $62 million in 2008-09, through AusAID, in humanitarian and reconstruction assistance to Afghanistan to help meet the basic health, education and food needs of Afghans living in Afghanistan and the reintegration and protection of Afghans from bordering countries.
Total Australian Official Development Assistance (ODA) to Afghanistan in 2008-09 is estimated to total $122 million, including AusAID expenditure and ODA-eligible expenditure by other government departments.
Assistance with ongoing humanitarian needs will be complemented by assistance focused on rebuilding a stable Afghanistan. Australian assistance will strengthen the capacity, transparency and accountability of the Afghan Government and administration (including in law enforcement).
Australian assistance will help build government and civil society capacity to deliver improved basic services, promote human rights awareness and support community-led recovery. Australia will also provide land mine risk education and removal, in addition to rehabilitation assistance for those injured by land mines.
In addition to assistance delivered at the national level, in Oruzgan Province and on the border region with Pakistan, Australia will support local reconstruction and technical training.
Iraq Humanitarian and Reconstruction Assistance
Australia will provide $140 million over three years, with $60 million in 2008-09, for humanitarian assistance and reconstruction priorities and to assist in building the capacity of the Iraqi Government in key sectors.
The Australian Government's enhanced package of assistance will help meet the immediate humanitarian needs of Iraq's vulnerable civilian population by providing access to essential food items, emergency shelter, clean water and adequate sanitation and basic health services. It will improve Iraqi Government capacity and assist reconstruction efforts in Iraq by improving basic services, particularly in agriculture, and supporting mine risk education.
To deliver this assistance, the Government will work closely with key international humanitarian and development agencies including the International Committee of the Red Cross, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the World Food Programme and the UN Children's Fund (UNICEF).
Media Contacts:
Courtney Hoogen (Mr Smith's Office) 0488 244 901
Sabina Curatolo (Mr McMullan's Office) 0400 318 205
Brian Mitchell (Mr Kerr's Office) 0434 160 539
AusAID Public Affairs 0417 680 590
Media Man Australia Profiles
Politics
AA0838
13 May 2008
2008-09 International Development Assistance Budget
The 2008-09 Budget lays the foundation for implementing the Government's long-term commitment to increase Australia's Official Development Assistance (ODA) to 0.5 per cent of Gross National Income (GNI) by 2015-16.
Australia will provide an estimated $3.7 billion in ODA in 2008-09, increasing Australia's ratio of ODA to GNI from 0.30 per cent in 2007-08 to 0.32 per cent in 2008-09. The Government expects to increase Australia's ODA to levels equivalent to 0.35 per cent of GNI in 2009-10, 0.37 per cent of GNI in 2010-11 and 0.38 per cent of GNI in 2011-12.
The new measures contained in this Budget give effect to the Government's election commitments to address climate change adaptation needs, establish Australian leadership on disability and eliminating avoidable blindness and improve access to clean water and sanitation.
The 2008-09 Budget increases the focus of the program on practical development outcomes, promoting faster progress towards the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and greater attention to alleviating the situation of the vulnerable.
In 2008-09 Australia will scale up expenditure in major sectors influencing MDG outcomes, including education (up 5 per cent), health (up 8 per cent), rural development (up 7 per cent), environment (up 7 per cent) and infrastructure (up 17 per cent). Assistance to help the most vulnerable, particularly those who suffer disability or who are refugees or victims of humanitarian crisis, will also increase.
Budget Highlights
Making faster progress towards the MDGs
The Australian Government is committed to helping developing country partners attain the MDGs. Most developing countries in the Asia-Pacific region can claim progress in meeting some of the MDGs, however, none is on course to achieve them all. Making faster progress on the MDGs requires a concerted and well-coordinated global response.
Australia's development assistance helps partners expand economic activity to create jobs and raise incomes, combat disease and improve nutrition, raise basic educational attainment, and improve the responsiveness and accountability of the state in meeting citizens' basic needs.
The Government will increase Australia's multilateral engagement, through increased multilateral development financing and a major increase of $200 million over four years in Australia's core funding for key UN agencies leading efforts to achieve the MDGs.
New multi-year allocations are made to improve access to clean water and basic sanitation ($300 million over three years) and to meet high priority climate adaptation needs in vulnerable countries ($150 million over three years), implementing the election commitments made by the Government.
Priority will be given to helping the Pacific and Papua New Guinea achieve the MDGs through expanded assistance in 2008-09. New programs focusing on infrastructure development, land administration and public sector capacity building will contribute to the Pacific Partnerships for Development outlined in the Prime Minister's March 2008 Port Moresby Declaration. The partnerships will provide a new framework for Australia and the Pacific island nations to commit jointly to achieving improved development outcomes, on the basis of mutual respect and mutual responsibility.
Addressing the needs of the vulnerable
Action to address disadvantage and vulnerability is essential to alleviating poverty in our region. The most vulnerable include those who suffer disability or who are refugees or victims of humanitarian crisis. They are cut off from access to basic services and the opportunity to improve their quality of life.
A significant scaling up in assistance for some of the most vulnerable - those suffering avoidable blindness and people with disabilities - will commence in 2008-09, piloting approaches to better eye and vision care and developing a strategy for addressing disability needs through the development assistance program.
Increasing assistance will be provided to new partners including Iraq and Afghanistan in transition from conflict. Increased assistance will support vulnerable civilian populations and help underpin reconstruction.
Further details on development assistance initiatives in the 2008-09 Budget are provided below.
Access to Clean Water and Effective Sanitation
Australia will invest $300 million over three years, with $8 million in 2008-09, to address the critical challenge to health and wellbeing posed by inadequate access to clean water and sanitation.
This initiative will improve access for the poor to clean water and effective sanitation in urban, peri-urban and rural areas and provide more predictable water supply by protecting fresh water sources. Better management of water resources and improved sanitation will reduce the transmission of disease and lead to improved health for poor people, particularly women and children.
Adaptation to Climate Change
Australia will invest $150 million over three years, with $35 million in 2008‑09, to meet urgent climate change adaptation needs in vulnerable countries in Australia's region.
Funding will support improved scientific information on climate change impacts, more effective strategic planning and vulnerability assessments and the implementation of high priority adaptation measures, for example, by better protecting infrastructure from extreme weather events and securing fresh water supplies. Funding will increase planning and investment in responses that reduce the vulnerability of communities. Support will address specific country and regional needs, for example, better management of the Mekong river basin, better urban planning in the mega-cities of Asia, and measuring sea level change, modelling sea inundation and assessing coastal vulnerability in Pacific island states.
Fighting Avoidable Blindness
Australia will invest $45 million over two years on meetings its election commitment to help eliminate avoidable blindness in the region and on establishing a comprehensive strategy for addressing disability in partner developing countries.
Most funding will be used to support a pilot eye and vision care program to address blindness and vision impairment, including by expanding the number of qualified eye health workers.
UN Partnership for MDGs
Australia will invest an additional $200 million over four years to strengthen partnerships with key United Nations development agencies.
Australian development assistance will boost the capacity of UNICEF, WHO, UNFPA, UNIFEM, UNDP, UNOCHA, and UNAIDS to lead global efforts to realise the Millennium Development Goals. Core funding for these organisations enable Australia to contribute to work on issues as diverse as increasing child literacy, improving maternal and child health and the empowerment of women in countries beyond our own region.
Pacific Land Program
Australia will invest $54 million over four years, with $6.5 million in 2008‑09, to protect customary land rights, promote economic and social development, and reduce the potential for instability through land-related conflict in the Pacific.
Assistance will support partner government‑led improvements in land administration. Australian funding will help address the challenges to land use and ownership from urbanisation. Clarification of land title is a key prerequisite for private investment. Funding will also improve the skills of professionals and semi‑professionals in areas such as planning, surveying and valuing.
Pacific Regional Infrastructure Facility
Australia will invest $127 million over four years, with $5.5 million in 2008-09, to improve basic infrastructure services in the Pacific.
Targeted support to Pacific island nations will address local constraints to growth and challenges to nation building and stability. Australian funding for improved infrastructure services in both rural and urban areas including transport, water, sanitation, waste management, energy and communications will facilitate growth and enable more Pacific islanders to participate in the development process.
Investing in Pacific Public Sector Capacity
Australia will invest $107 million over four years, with $6 million in 2008-09, to strengthen public sector administration in the Pacific.
Funding will improve public sector performance by supporting management and policy reform, while also providing immediate assistance to improve individual and institutional capacity in priority areas as identified by partner governments in the region. The inititive will address a key impediment to poverty reduction, by helping to improve service delivery and enable growth.
Afghanistan Humanitarian and Reconstruction Assistance
Australia will contribute $62 million in 2008-09, through AusAID, in humanitarian and reconstruction assistance to Afghanistan to help meet the basic health, education and food needs of Afghans living in Afghanistan and the reintegration and protection of Afghans from bordering countries.
Total Australian Official Development Assistance (ODA) to Afghanistan in 2008-09 is estimated to total $122 million, including AusAID expenditure and ODA-eligible expenditure by other government departments.
Assistance with ongoing humanitarian needs will be complemented by assistance focused on rebuilding a stable Afghanistan. Australian assistance will strengthen the capacity, transparency and accountability of the Afghan Government and administration (including in law enforcement).
Australian assistance will help build government and civil society capacity to deliver improved basic services, promote human rights awareness and support community-led recovery. Australia will also provide land mine risk education and removal, in addition to rehabilitation assistance for those injured by land mines.
In addition to assistance delivered at the national level, in Oruzgan Province and on the border region with Pakistan, Australia will support local reconstruction and technical training.
Iraq Humanitarian and Reconstruction Assistance
Australia will provide $140 million over three years, with $60 million in 2008-09, for humanitarian assistance and reconstruction priorities and to assist in building the capacity of the Iraqi Government in key sectors.
The Australian Government's enhanced package of assistance will help meet the immediate humanitarian needs of Iraq's vulnerable civilian population by providing access to essential food items, emergency shelter, clean water and adequate sanitation and basic health services. It will improve Iraqi Government capacity and assist reconstruction efforts in Iraq by improving basic services, particularly in agriculture, and supporting mine risk education.
To deliver this assistance, the Government will work closely with key international humanitarian and development agencies including the International Committee of the Red Cross, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the World Food Programme and the UN Children's Fund (UNICEF).
Media Contacts:
Courtney Hoogen (Mr Smith's Office) 0488 244 901
Sabina Curatolo (Mr McMullan's Office) 0400 318 205
Brian Mitchell (Mr Kerr's Office) 0434 160 539
AusAID Public Affairs 0417 680 590
Media Man Australia Profiles
Politics
Saturday, May 10, 2008
Obama may declare victory on May 20 - The Australian - 9th May 2008
DEMOCRATIC White House hopeful Barack Obama said today he could declare victory over Hillary Clinton on May 20, when Kentucky and Oregon may put him over the top in terms of elected delegates.
"If at that point we have the majority of pledged delegates, which is possible, then I think we can make a pretty strong claim that we have got the most runs and it's the ninth inning and we have won," he told NBC television, referring to the final inning of a baseball game.
"But, you know, I think it is also important for us to, if we win, do so in a way that brings the party together," said the Illinois senator, who has refused to join calls for Senator Clinton to quit the acrimonious race.
"One of the obvious big concerns that all of us have is making sure that we focus our attention on the Republicans in the fall, and we're in a strong position to do that," Senator Obama said.
According to his campaign, Senator Obama needs just 33 more pledged delegates to reach a majority of the Democratic nominating officials, 1606.
A total of 28 are up for grabs next Wednesday in West Virginia, which is considered Clinton country. Then on May 20, Oregon will elect 52 delegates and Kentucky 51.
But while a majority of pledged delegates would be potent symbolically, Senator Obama would still need support from Democratic grandees called "superdelegates" to reach the final winning line for the nomination - 2025.
Agencies
Media Man Australia Profiles
Politics
"If at that point we have the majority of pledged delegates, which is possible, then I think we can make a pretty strong claim that we have got the most runs and it's the ninth inning and we have won," he told NBC television, referring to the final inning of a baseball game.
"But, you know, I think it is also important for us to, if we win, do so in a way that brings the party together," said the Illinois senator, who has refused to join calls for Senator Clinton to quit the acrimonious race.
"One of the obvious big concerns that all of us have is making sure that we focus our attention on the Republicans in the fall, and we're in a strong position to do that," Senator Obama said.
According to his campaign, Senator Obama needs just 33 more pledged delegates to reach a majority of the Democratic nominating officials, 1606.
A total of 28 are up for grabs next Wednesday in West Virginia, which is considered Clinton country. Then on May 20, Oregon will elect 52 delegates and Kentucky 51.
But while a majority of pledged delegates would be potent symbolically, Senator Obama would still need support from Democratic grandees called "superdelegates" to reach the final winning line for the nomination - 2025.
Agencies
Media Man Australia Profiles
Politics
Friday, May 09, 2008
Count starts in Pennsylvania, By staff writers and wires -23rd April 2008 - News.com.au
* Hillary Clinton tipped to win Pennsylvania primary
* But even with a win she will still be behind
* Pennsylvania primary: Latest campaign pictures
HILLARY Clinton needs a big win in today's Pennsylvania primary to keep alive her improbable US presidential campaign.
The New York senator was tipped for victory in late opinion polls, but many observers think it will take a double-digit triumph to stave off more calls for her to quit the epic Democratic nomination race.
Senator Clinton, however, said that a simple victory would be enough. "I think a win under any circumstances is a terrific accomplishment," she said after greeting supporters at a polling station who chanted "Madam President".
Polls have closed in the state and US media have reported a tight battle in the early count.
While the battle has stretched on for well over 12 months, many are starting to wish it could be settled in 12 rounds. Wrestling body WWE has imagined what it would be like if the candidates just settled their differences in the ring.
See the animation here:
All three candidates sent the WWE a taped message to be played on primary day:
Senator Obama downplayed the likelihood that he could win in Pennsylvania, a victory that would likely knock Senator Clinton out of the race, but pointed out that he had whittled down her lead in most polls from 20 points to single figures.
"I have come to the conclusion that this race will continue until the last primary or caucus vote is cast. And that's not that far away," he said. "Should I end up being the nominee, the work that we've done here in Pennsylvania I think will be extraordinarily helpful in the general election," he said.
Senator Clinton needs a fresh burst of momentum ahead of the next round of contests in Indiana and North Carolina on May 7 (Australian time), which are followed quickly by the last six voting showdowns of the nominating marathon into early June.
There are 158 pledged delegates up for grabs today, the most of any of the remaining contests.
She played up Senator Obama's significant fundraising edge, which has allowed him to triple her advertising buy in the north-eastern state, according to her campaign's estimates.
"Maybe the question ought to be, why can't he close the deal with his extraordinary financial advantage, why can't he win a state like this one if that is the way it turns out?"
Figures released by the US Federal Election Commission have shown Senator Obama's war chest at the start of April at more than $US51 million ($54 million) to Senator Clinton's $US31 million ($33 million).
Senator Clinton is making her case to Democratic "superdelegates", the party officials who will now effectively crown the nominee, since neither candidate is likely to reach the 2025 pledged delegates needed to win outright.
But Senator Clinton is also unlikely to be able to overhaul Senator Obama's lead in delegates even with strong wins in the remaining contests. She also trails him in the popular vote and the number of states won.
Her only remaining hope is to convince the superdelegates that only she can win a general election match-up against Republican John McCain. Part of that strategy involves staying alive as long as possible and hoping Senator Obama self-destructs.
In an indication Senator Obama knows he will not win today, he is due to move straight on to Indiana later in the night, while Senator Clinton has scheduled a victory party in Philadelphia.
- with AFP correspondents in Philadelphia
Media Man Australia Profiles
Politics
* But even with a win she will still be behind
* Pennsylvania primary: Latest campaign pictures
HILLARY Clinton needs a big win in today's Pennsylvania primary to keep alive her improbable US presidential campaign.
The New York senator was tipped for victory in late opinion polls, but many observers think it will take a double-digit triumph to stave off more calls for her to quit the epic Democratic nomination race.
Senator Clinton, however, said that a simple victory would be enough. "I think a win under any circumstances is a terrific accomplishment," she said after greeting supporters at a polling station who chanted "Madam President".
Polls have closed in the state and US media have reported a tight battle in the early count.
While the battle has stretched on for well over 12 months, many are starting to wish it could be settled in 12 rounds. Wrestling body WWE has imagined what it would be like if the candidates just settled their differences in the ring.
See the animation here:
All three candidates sent the WWE a taped message to be played on primary day:
Senator Obama downplayed the likelihood that he could win in Pennsylvania, a victory that would likely knock Senator Clinton out of the race, but pointed out that he had whittled down her lead in most polls from 20 points to single figures.
"I have come to the conclusion that this race will continue until the last primary or caucus vote is cast. And that's not that far away," he said. "Should I end up being the nominee, the work that we've done here in Pennsylvania I think will be extraordinarily helpful in the general election," he said.
Senator Clinton needs a fresh burst of momentum ahead of the next round of contests in Indiana and North Carolina on May 7 (Australian time), which are followed quickly by the last six voting showdowns of the nominating marathon into early June.
There are 158 pledged delegates up for grabs today, the most of any of the remaining contests.
She played up Senator Obama's significant fundraising edge, which has allowed him to triple her advertising buy in the north-eastern state, according to her campaign's estimates.
"Maybe the question ought to be, why can't he close the deal with his extraordinary financial advantage, why can't he win a state like this one if that is the way it turns out?"
Figures released by the US Federal Election Commission have shown Senator Obama's war chest at the start of April at more than $US51 million ($54 million) to Senator Clinton's $US31 million ($33 million).
Senator Clinton is making her case to Democratic "superdelegates", the party officials who will now effectively crown the nominee, since neither candidate is likely to reach the 2025 pledged delegates needed to win outright.
But Senator Clinton is also unlikely to be able to overhaul Senator Obama's lead in delegates even with strong wins in the remaining contests. She also trails him in the popular vote and the number of states won.
Her only remaining hope is to convince the superdelegates that only she can win a general election match-up against Republican John McCain. Part of that strategy involves staying alive as long as possible and hoping Senator Obama self-destructs.
In an indication Senator Obama knows he will not win today, he is due to move straight on to Indiana later in the night, while Senator Clinton has scheduled a victory party in Philadelphia.
- with AFP correspondents in Philadelphia
Media Man Australia Profiles
Politics
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
McCain, Obama Tag Team Hillary - TMZ - 21st April 2008
First wrestlers got into politics (Jesse Ventura, anyone?) -- now politicians are getting into wrestling. And it's on TV tonight.
Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain each taped a short video that will be played during tonight's show. It's hard to figure out which one comes across more out of touch -- Hillary (calling herself "Hill-Rod"), Barack ("Can you smell what Barack is cooking!") or McCain (calling his backers "McCainiacs").
If Hillary takes on The Undertaker, our money's on Hil.
Website
Media Man Australia Profiles
Wrestling
Politics
Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain each taped a short video that will be played during tonight's show. It's hard to figure out which one comes across more out of touch -- Hillary (calling herself "Hill-Rod"), Barack ("Can you smell what Barack is cooking!") or McCain (calling his backers "McCainiacs").
If Hillary takes on The Undertaker, our money's on Hil.
Website
Media Man Australia Profiles
Wrestling
Politics
Sunday, April 27, 2008
Dump power selloff, Greens tell Iemma - The Sydney Morning Herald - 26th April 2008
The Greens and unions have called on a prominent Labor MP to convince NSW Premier Morris Iemma to abandon his bid to sell off the state's electricity assets.
The Greens and union members held a protest over the plan outside NSW Labor MP Michael Daley's office in the Sydney suburb of Maroubra.
Greens MP John Kaye said Mr Daley was a keen supporter of Mr Iemma's proposal to sell off the assets.
"Michael Daley needs to tap Morris Iemma on the shoulder and he needs to say 'You've got it wrong mate, this is not a goer'," Mr Kaye told reporters.
"The big issue is what happens the week after next on the 5th and 6th of May ... the (ALP state) conference is going to say no ... but Iemma and (Treasurer Michael) Costa have both said they're going to go ahead anyway and take the Labor government into uncharted waters."
The pair are facing a "massive defeat" over the issue at the ALP state conference, he said.
"What we're saying is as this all happens, money is being wasted.
"Money is being wasted on very expensive consultancy, very expensive banks and using the bureaucracy time to develop a privatisation plan that will probably never make its way through parliament."
Media Man Australia Profiles
Politics
The Greens and union members held a protest over the plan outside NSW Labor MP Michael Daley's office in the Sydney suburb of Maroubra.
Greens MP John Kaye said Mr Daley was a keen supporter of Mr Iemma's proposal to sell off the assets.
"Michael Daley needs to tap Morris Iemma on the shoulder and he needs to say 'You've got it wrong mate, this is not a goer'," Mr Kaye told reporters.
"The big issue is what happens the week after next on the 5th and 6th of May ... the (ALP state) conference is going to say no ... but Iemma and (Treasurer Michael) Costa have both said they're going to go ahead anyway and take the Labor government into uncharted waters."
The pair are facing a "massive defeat" over the issue at the ALP state conference, he said.
"What we're saying is as this all happens, money is being wasted.
"Money is being wasted on very expensive consultancy, very expensive banks and using the bureaucracy time to develop a privatisation plan that will probably never make its way through parliament."
Media Man Australia Profiles
Politics
Saturday, April 19, 2008
Rudd opens 2020 Summit, by Christian Kerr - The Australian - 19th April 2008
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has opened the 2020 Summit, calling for new ideas to shape our nation's future.
“Today we’re trying to do something new,” Mr Rudd said.
“Today we’re throwing open the windows of our democracy to let a bit of fresh air in.”
The Prime Minister has asked for new insights into how to govern Australia.
“The old way of governing has long been creaking and groaning, often a triumph of the trivial over the substantial, often a triumph of the trivial over the substantial, often a triumph of the partisan over the positive.
“And the truth is all sides of politics, Brendan’s and mine, we are both guilty of this.
“It’s time we started to try and turn the page.”
Mr Rudd said the challenges facing Australia today are unprecedented in complexity and intensity.
He reiterated the summit priorities: future prosperity; skills, education and training; climate change and sustainability; rural industries; national health; stronger communities; indigenous disadvantage; a creative arts industry; governance and Australia’s security.
Mr Rudd asked the summit’s 10 groups to nominate at least one big idea and three concrete policy proposals – one of which must involve no or negative cost.
“What is our simple objective? To shake the tree,” he told delegates.
Media Man Australia Profiles
Kevin Rudd
Politics
“Today we’re trying to do something new,” Mr Rudd said.
“Today we’re throwing open the windows of our democracy to let a bit of fresh air in.”
The Prime Minister has asked for new insights into how to govern Australia.
“The old way of governing has long been creaking and groaning, often a triumph of the trivial over the substantial, often a triumph of the trivial over the substantial, often a triumph of the partisan over the positive.
“And the truth is all sides of politics, Brendan’s and mine, we are both guilty of this.
“It’s time we started to try and turn the page.”
Mr Rudd said the challenges facing Australia today are unprecedented in complexity and intensity.
He reiterated the summit priorities: future prosperity; skills, education and training; climate change and sustainability; rural industries; national health; stronger communities; indigenous disadvantage; a creative arts industry; governance and Australia’s security.
Mr Rudd asked the summit’s 10 groups to nominate at least one big idea and three concrete policy proposals – one of which must involve no or negative cost.
“What is our simple objective? To shake the tree,” he told delegates.
Media Man Australia Profiles
Kevin Rudd
Politics
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
National conversation must go on, by Barry Cohen - The Australian - 26th Feb 2008
THE durbar planned for April to provide us with "ideas for the future" is a noble objective if participatory democracy is your goal.
Eyebrows, however, have been raised somewhat higher than usual, followed by the obvious question: "Isn't that why we elected you?"
One newspaper speculated that among the "magnificent 1000" would be Gough, Malcolm, Bob and Paul, no doubt to ensure that youth were given a fair go, while media moguls David Gyngell, David Leckie and Eddie McGuire were included because they obviously lack a medium for projecting their views. Other shrinking violets suggested include Mick Dodson, Tim Flannery, John Symond and Dick Smith. It will be good to hear from them for a change, particularly Dick. What would a national talkfest be without him?
There is, we are told, no shortage of volunteers. Let's hope they are not just the usual suspects.
The concept is good but my concern is with the format and the time available for the participants.
There are precedents for such government-sponsored crystal ball gazing, Barry Jones's Commission for the Future (1985-98) being the most recent. It was, Barry assures me, the first Australian body to raise the spectre of global warming.
Of concern is what happens when 1000 of Australia's finest descend on Canberra and find they have only a few minutes to give tongue? The aforementioned take that long to clear their throats. This is not, however, the time to be churlish about an exercise enabling more citizens to contribute towards a national discussion about Australia's future. Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's sincerity in wanting to bring more people into the decision-making process is beyond question but the appropriate place to begin is in his own back yard.
Let's start with parliament. All Oppositions claim that good ideas do not reside solely with one side: until they become the government. Then they would rather bite off their arm than concede the Opposition has an idea worth adopting. It's seen as a sign of weakness.
They could not be more wrong and should the day come when the Prime Minister stands in the house and accepts an Opposition proposal he will be amazed at the public's reaction. It will be seen as a sign of magnanimity. There are early signs that the Prime Minister understands this and his invitation to Opposition Leader Brendan Nelson to join him in a war cabinet to tackle indigenous issues is encouraging. If this degree of agreement is maintained it won't be long before we'll be talking about the Rudd-Nelson government.
Now to the parliamentary process. For years, in this column, I have been railing against the takeover of question time by the previous Labor Opposition's executive. Traditionally, QT was one of the few opportunities members and senators had to quiz ministers about their portfolio responsibilities. It enabled the Opposition to place the PM and his ministers under pressure and, while the leader and deputy leader traditionally received a few more questions, shadow ministers received the same number as backbenchers.
During the Howard years that changed as successive leaders of the Labor Opposition and their shadow ministers dominated QT. Opposition backbenchers rarely got a question. When they did, it was only after it had been approved by the tactics committee. Amazingly, Opposition backbenchers surrendered on this score without a struggle.
I tried to imagine Arthur Calwell, Gough Whitlam or Jim Killen being told they could ask a question only after it had been approved by a tactics committee. It is depressing to see that the new Coalition executive is following much the same practice. Hopefully the Coalition backbench will show some spine and demand a return to the traditions of Westminster. Picture Winston Churchill being told when he could ask a question.
The Prime Minister could also contribute to more open debate and the flourishing of new ideas by releasing the shackles on his backbenchers and allowing greater freedom in debate. Labor has traditionally demanded its MPs toe the line and stick to party policy inside and outside parliament. If they don't, they can be expelled from the party.
When legislation is vital and defeat would require the Government to resign, absolute discipline is essential, but there are many instances when greater latitude could be permitted. Freedom to speak their mind and on occasions vote against the Government would not only revitalise parliament but encourage members to take initiatives and canvass alternative views and programs. In the not too distant future it will dawn on Labor backbenchers how little influence they have on government policy and that the same bureaucrats who advised the Howard government are calling the shots. They will lose heart.
Parliament aside, new avenues are opening up through the internet to enable governments and Oppositions to communicate with voters in a manner previously unimagined. New legislation can be explained, comments received and views exchanged. Opportunities exist for an ongoing dialogue between parliament and the voters. It doesn't necessarily mean that advice received from the public will be followed and this could mean some dissatisfied customers, but at least they will have had an opportunity to put their views.
The forthcoming ideas convocation is a novel concept. It will succeed only if it is part of an ongoing process that enables Government and Opposition to listen, understand and respond. If that doesn't happen, it will be seen as nothing more than a PR stunt.
Barry Cohen, a former Labor minister, is a regular contributor to The Australian's opinion page.
Media Man Australia Profiles
Politics
Eyebrows, however, have been raised somewhat higher than usual, followed by the obvious question: "Isn't that why we elected you?"
One newspaper speculated that among the "magnificent 1000" would be Gough, Malcolm, Bob and Paul, no doubt to ensure that youth were given a fair go, while media moguls David Gyngell, David Leckie and Eddie McGuire were included because they obviously lack a medium for projecting their views. Other shrinking violets suggested include Mick Dodson, Tim Flannery, John Symond and Dick Smith. It will be good to hear from them for a change, particularly Dick. What would a national talkfest be without him?
There is, we are told, no shortage of volunteers. Let's hope they are not just the usual suspects.
The concept is good but my concern is with the format and the time available for the participants.
There are precedents for such government-sponsored crystal ball gazing, Barry Jones's Commission for the Future (1985-98) being the most recent. It was, Barry assures me, the first Australian body to raise the spectre of global warming.
Of concern is what happens when 1000 of Australia's finest descend on Canberra and find they have only a few minutes to give tongue? The aforementioned take that long to clear their throats. This is not, however, the time to be churlish about an exercise enabling more citizens to contribute towards a national discussion about Australia's future. Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's sincerity in wanting to bring more people into the decision-making process is beyond question but the appropriate place to begin is in his own back yard.
Let's start with parliament. All Oppositions claim that good ideas do not reside solely with one side: until they become the government. Then they would rather bite off their arm than concede the Opposition has an idea worth adopting. It's seen as a sign of weakness.
They could not be more wrong and should the day come when the Prime Minister stands in the house and accepts an Opposition proposal he will be amazed at the public's reaction. It will be seen as a sign of magnanimity. There are early signs that the Prime Minister understands this and his invitation to Opposition Leader Brendan Nelson to join him in a war cabinet to tackle indigenous issues is encouraging. If this degree of agreement is maintained it won't be long before we'll be talking about the Rudd-Nelson government.
Now to the parliamentary process. For years, in this column, I have been railing against the takeover of question time by the previous Labor Opposition's executive. Traditionally, QT was one of the few opportunities members and senators had to quiz ministers about their portfolio responsibilities. It enabled the Opposition to place the PM and his ministers under pressure and, while the leader and deputy leader traditionally received a few more questions, shadow ministers received the same number as backbenchers.
During the Howard years that changed as successive leaders of the Labor Opposition and their shadow ministers dominated QT. Opposition backbenchers rarely got a question. When they did, it was only after it had been approved by the tactics committee. Amazingly, Opposition backbenchers surrendered on this score without a struggle.
I tried to imagine Arthur Calwell, Gough Whitlam or Jim Killen being told they could ask a question only after it had been approved by a tactics committee. It is depressing to see that the new Coalition executive is following much the same practice. Hopefully the Coalition backbench will show some spine and demand a return to the traditions of Westminster. Picture Winston Churchill being told when he could ask a question.
The Prime Minister could also contribute to more open debate and the flourishing of new ideas by releasing the shackles on his backbenchers and allowing greater freedom in debate. Labor has traditionally demanded its MPs toe the line and stick to party policy inside and outside parliament. If they don't, they can be expelled from the party.
When legislation is vital and defeat would require the Government to resign, absolute discipline is essential, but there are many instances when greater latitude could be permitted. Freedom to speak their mind and on occasions vote against the Government would not only revitalise parliament but encourage members to take initiatives and canvass alternative views and programs. In the not too distant future it will dawn on Labor backbenchers how little influence they have on government policy and that the same bureaucrats who advised the Howard government are calling the shots. They will lose heart.
Parliament aside, new avenues are opening up through the internet to enable governments and Oppositions to communicate with voters in a manner previously unimagined. New legislation can be explained, comments received and views exchanged. Opportunities exist for an ongoing dialogue between parliament and the voters. It doesn't necessarily mean that advice received from the public will be followed and this could mean some dissatisfied customers, but at least they will have had an opportunity to put their views.
The forthcoming ideas convocation is a novel concept. It will succeed only if it is part of an ongoing process that enables Government and Opposition to listen, understand and respond. If that doesn't happen, it will be seen as nothing more than a PR stunt.
Barry Cohen, a former Labor minister, is a regular contributor to The Australian's opinion page.
Media Man Australia Profiles
Politics
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Kevin Rudd says sorry, by Dylan Welch - The Sydney Morning Herald - 13th Feb 2008
· Standing ovation for PM's speech
· Backs turned on Brendan Nelson
· Keating says words mean more than money
· Tuckey leaves before apology
· Crowds celebrate
Australia has formally apologised to the stolen generations with Prime Minister Kevin Rudd reading a speech in Federal Parliament this morning.
The apology was read at 9am to the minute, as the first action of the second sitting day of the 42nd Parliament of Australia.
Both Mr Rudd and Indigenous Affairs Minister Jenny Macklin received a standing ovation as they entered the Great Hall before the Prime Minister delivered the speech.
The reading of the 361-word apology was completed by 9.03am and was watched by hundreds of parliamentarians, former prime ministers and representatives of the indigenous community.
Former prime ministers Paul Keating, Bob Hawke, Gough Whitlam and Malcolm Fraser and Sir William Deane were all seated on the floor of the Parliament as well as 17 people representing the stolen generation.
Removing a stain from the soul of Australia
In another address directly after reading the apology, Mr Rudd spoke of removing a "stain from the soul of Australia".
"The time has come, well and truly come ... for all Australians, those who are indigenous and those who are not to come together, truly reconcile and together build a truly great nation."
The Prime Minister also discussed the first-hand accounts in the Keating government-sponsored report Bringing Them Home.
"There is something terribly primal about these first-hand accounts. The pain is searing, it screams from the pages - the hurt, the humiliation, the degradation and the sheer brutality of the act of physically separating a mother from her children is a deep assault on our senses and on our most elemental sense of humanity.
"These stories cry out to be heard, they cry out for an apology.
"Instead from the nation's Parliament there has been a stony and stubborn and deafening silence for more than a decade.
"A view that somehow we the Parliament should suspend our most basic instincts of what is right and what is wrong.
"A view that instead we should look for any pretext to push this great wrong to one side.
"To leave it languishing with the historians, the academics and the cultural warriors as if the stolen generations are little more than an interesting sociological phenomenon.
"But the stolen generations are not intellectual curiosities, they are human beings, human beings who have been damaged deeply by the decisions of parliaments and governments.
Time for denial is at an end
"But as of today the time for denial, the time for delay, has at last come to an end."
At 9.28pm Mr Rudd finished his address, and was greeted by loud and lasting applause by both sides of the house.
He reached across the house's table and shook the hand of Opposition Leader Brendan Nelson before returning to the front bench, where he himself applauded.
Brendan Nelson
Dr Nelson then stood and delivered a speech in support of the apology.
"We will be at our best today, and every day, if we call to place ourselves in the shoes of others," he said, "imbued with the imaginative capacity to see this issue through their eyes with decency and respect.
"We cannot from the comfort of the 21st century begin to imagine what they overcame, indigenous and non-indigenous to give us what we have and make us who we are.
"We do know that language, disease, ignorance, good intentions, basic human prejudices and a cultural and technological chasm combined to create a harshness exceed only by the land.
"In saying we are sorry, and deeply sorry, we remind ourselves that each generation lives in ignorance of the long-term consequences of its actions."
At the end of Mr Rudds's speech, all MPs stood except for the Liberal MP Chris Pearce. Mr Pearce did stand after Dr Nelson's speech.
Liberal MPs Wilson Tuckey and Don Randall were not in the chamber.
People watching in the Great Hall turned their backs during Dr Nelson's speech.
Paul Keating: words more important than money
Mr Keating told ABC TV: "This is a day of open hearts''.
"A country has always got to look for its golden threads and when we start looking for the black threads you lose your way,'' he said. "We lost our way for a decade looking for black threads.
"What is important is that when policy cut across the human spirit we are always in for misery and as a consequence the stolen generation was a cut right across the spirit of those people and the soul of the country.''
Mr Keating's government was responsible for commissioning a report into the stolen generations which focused on possible processes of compensation.
However today, Mr Keating said words were more important than money.
"It is true the report does in some respects focus on compensation,'' he said.
"The most important thing is the sorry. The most important thing is the national emotional response. I don't believe that these separations or that sadness will ever be settled in a monetary sense.
"It can never be settled in a monetary sense. Far more important in my term was to settle it in an emotional sense and that's what the prime minister and government have done today.''
Redfern
Mr Rudd's speech received a standing ovation at the Redfern Community Centre, where hundreds gathered.
Residents, workers, families, students and Sydney's Lord Mayor Clover Moore braved the rain to watch the speech via a large outdoor screen.
David Page, composer with the indigenous dance group Bangarra Dance Theatre, said he liked the fact that Mr Rudd made a personal apology.
"It was very moving to see a prime minister with a bit of heart. I loved it when he said he was sorry. There was just something personal about it. It's very hard for a prime minister to be personal," he said.
Enid Williams, 72, who was brought up on a mission in north Queensland after her father was forcibly removed from his family, said she was happy with Mr Rudd's speech, but said it was now important to look to the future.
"I'm 72. The main thing is the young people, to give them a better future."
Martin Place
At Martin Place in Sydney, hundreds of Sydneysiders from all walks of life gathered to watch the Sorry Day celebrations holding Australian, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander flags.
Men and women in business suits, schoolchildren and other passers-by of all different backgrounds cried, smiled and stood in respect as they listened to Mr Rudd apologise.
Lawn at Parliament House
Many thousands more assembled on a lawn in front of Parliament House to watch the apology on a big screen. As Mr Rudd delivered the first of three sorrys, loud applause and cheering rang out.
Aboriginal flags and Australian flags coloured the air and as Mr Rudd closed his address, the crowd rose to their feet in applause. It was a standing ovation. Many were crying, most were smiling and others just quietly said yes.
As Dr Nelson took the microphone, booing was heard. One woman said he shouldn't have been allowed to speak.
Helen Ford, 70, from Beacon Hill said Mr Rudd's speech was magnificent.
"Mr Rudd's speech was just magnificent. It's a wonderful day. Pity about the Opposition speech."
Ray Finn, 52, from Oodnadatta, South Australia, said: "My family had been affected directly and I felt like the chain had finally broke from us.
"There's still racism to deal with but hopefully from this day we'll go forward together."
Torres Straits Islander Lydia George, from Erub Island, said: "The first speech was very symbolic. The second speaker tarnished it. I was thinking of my granddaughter and her future is now, not tomorrow. She'll face a new future that will be bright. The healing process has began."
Wilson Tuckey
Mr Rudd's speech was not greeted with unanimous approval, however, with Mr Tuckey telling Sky News shortly before 9am he doubted the speech - which has bipartisan support - would change anything.
"So the Prime Minister reads a speech, apparently some people stand up and sit down and then a miracle happens over night, there'll be no petrol sniffing ... and girls can sleep safely in the family bed at night," he said.
When asked by Sky News if he supported the apology, a technical error occurred, with Mr Tuckey telling the camera he was unable to hear the question.
- with Edmund Tadros, Yuko Narushima, Phillip Hudson, Leesha McKenny and AAP
TOMORROW: Sydney Morning Herald souvenir Sorry Day edition.
Media Man Australia Profiles
Politics
· Backs turned on Brendan Nelson
· Keating says words mean more than money
· Tuckey leaves before apology
· Crowds celebrate
Australia has formally apologised to the stolen generations with Prime Minister Kevin Rudd reading a speech in Federal Parliament this morning.
The apology was read at 9am to the minute, as the first action of the second sitting day of the 42nd Parliament of Australia.
Both Mr Rudd and Indigenous Affairs Minister Jenny Macklin received a standing ovation as they entered the Great Hall before the Prime Minister delivered the speech.
The reading of the 361-word apology was completed by 9.03am and was watched by hundreds of parliamentarians, former prime ministers and representatives of the indigenous community.
Former prime ministers Paul Keating, Bob Hawke, Gough Whitlam and Malcolm Fraser and Sir William Deane were all seated on the floor of the Parliament as well as 17 people representing the stolen generation.
Removing a stain from the soul of Australia
In another address directly after reading the apology, Mr Rudd spoke of removing a "stain from the soul of Australia".
"The time has come, well and truly come ... for all Australians, those who are indigenous and those who are not to come together, truly reconcile and together build a truly great nation."
The Prime Minister also discussed the first-hand accounts in the Keating government-sponsored report Bringing Them Home.
"There is something terribly primal about these first-hand accounts. The pain is searing, it screams from the pages - the hurt, the humiliation, the degradation and the sheer brutality of the act of physically separating a mother from her children is a deep assault on our senses and on our most elemental sense of humanity.
"These stories cry out to be heard, they cry out for an apology.
"Instead from the nation's Parliament there has been a stony and stubborn and deafening silence for more than a decade.
"A view that somehow we the Parliament should suspend our most basic instincts of what is right and what is wrong.
"A view that instead we should look for any pretext to push this great wrong to one side.
"To leave it languishing with the historians, the academics and the cultural warriors as if the stolen generations are little more than an interesting sociological phenomenon.
"But the stolen generations are not intellectual curiosities, they are human beings, human beings who have been damaged deeply by the decisions of parliaments and governments.
Time for denial is at an end
"But as of today the time for denial, the time for delay, has at last come to an end."
At 9.28pm Mr Rudd finished his address, and was greeted by loud and lasting applause by both sides of the house.
He reached across the house's table and shook the hand of Opposition Leader Brendan Nelson before returning to the front bench, where he himself applauded.
Brendan Nelson
Dr Nelson then stood and delivered a speech in support of the apology.
"We will be at our best today, and every day, if we call to place ourselves in the shoes of others," he said, "imbued with the imaginative capacity to see this issue through their eyes with decency and respect.
"We cannot from the comfort of the 21st century begin to imagine what they overcame, indigenous and non-indigenous to give us what we have and make us who we are.
"We do know that language, disease, ignorance, good intentions, basic human prejudices and a cultural and technological chasm combined to create a harshness exceed only by the land.
"In saying we are sorry, and deeply sorry, we remind ourselves that each generation lives in ignorance of the long-term consequences of its actions."
At the end of Mr Rudds's speech, all MPs stood except for the Liberal MP Chris Pearce. Mr Pearce did stand after Dr Nelson's speech.
Liberal MPs Wilson Tuckey and Don Randall were not in the chamber.
People watching in the Great Hall turned their backs during Dr Nelson's speech.
Paul Keating: words more important than money
Mr Keating told ABC TV: "This is a day of open hearts''.
"A country has always got to look for its golden threads and when we start looking for the black threads you lose your way,'' he said. "We lost our way for a decade looking for black threads.
"What is important is that when policy cut across the human spirit we are always in for misery and as a consequence the stolen generation was a cut right across the spirit of those people and the soul of the country.''
Mr Keating's government was responsible for commissioning a report into the stolen generations which focused on possible processes of compensation.
However today, Mr Keating said words were more important than money.
"It is true the report does in some respects focus on compensation,'' he said.
"The most important thing is the sorry. The most important thing is the national emotional response. I don't believe that these separations or that sadness will ever be settled in a monetary sense.
"It can never be settled in a monetary sense. Far more important in my term was to settle it in an emotional sense and that's what the prime minister and government have done today.''
Redfern
Mr Rudd's speech received a standing ovation at the Redfern Community Centre, where hundreds gathered.
Residents, workers, families, students and Sydney's Lord Mayor Clover Moore braved the rain to watch the speech via a large outdoor screen.
David Page, composer with the indigenous dance group Bangarra Dance Theatre, said he liked the fact that Mr Rudd made a personal apology.
"It was very moving to see a prime minister with a bit of heart. I loved it when he said he was sorry. There was just something personal about it. It's very hard for a prime minister to be personal," he said.
Enid Williams, 72, who was brought up on a mission in north Queensland after her father was forcibly removed from his family, said she was happy with Mr Rudd's speech, but said it was now important to look to the future.
"I'm 72. The main thing is the young people, to give them a better future."
Martin Place
At Martin Place in Sydney, hundreds of Sydneysiders from all walks of life gathered to watch the Sorry Day celebrations holding Australian, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander flags.
Men and women in business suits, schoolchildren and other passers-by of all different backgrounds cried, smiled and stood in respect as they listened to Mr Rudd apologise.
Lawn at Parliament House
Many thousands more assembled on a lawn in front of Parliament House to watch the apology on a big screen. As Mr Rudd delivered the first of three sorrys, loud applause and cheering rang out.
Aboriginal flags and Australian flags coloured the air and as Mr Rudd closed his address, the crowd rose to their feet in applause. It was a standing ovation. Many were crying, most were smiling and others just quietly said yes.
As Dr Nelson took the microphone, booing was heard. One woman said he shouldn't have been allowed to speak.
Helen Ford, 70, from Beacon Hill said Mr Rudd's speech was magnificent.
"Mr Rudd's speech was just magnificent. It's a wonderful day. Pity about the Opposition speech."
Ray Finn, 52, from Oodnadatta, South Australia, said: "My family had been affected directly and I felt like the chain had finally broke from us.
"There's still racism to deal with but hopefully from this day we'll go forward together."
Torres Straits Islander Lydia George, from Erub Island, said: "The first speech was very symbolic. The second speaker tarnished it. I was thinking of my granddaughter and her future is now, not tomorrow. She'll face a new future that will be bright. The healing process has began."
Wilson Tuckey
Mr Rudd's speech was not greeted with unanimous approval, however, with Mr Tuckey telling Sky News shortly before 9am he doubted the speech - which has bipartisan support - would change anything.
"So the Prime Minister reads a speech, apparently some people stand up and sit down and then a miracle happens over night, there'll be no petrol sniffing ... and girls can sleep safely in the family bed at night," he said.
When asked by Sky News if he supported the apology, a technical error occurred, with Mr Tuckey telling the camera he was unable to hear the question.
- with Edmund Tadros, Yuko Narushima, Phillip Hudson, Leesha McKenny and AAP
TOMORROW: Sydney Morning Herald souvenir Sorry Day edition.
Media Man Australia Profiles
Politics
Sunday, February 10, 2008
Whale of an idea comes from council, By Mark O'Brien - St George and Sutherland Shire Leader - 9th Feb 2008
SUTHERLAND Shire Council has voted to "adopt" a whale and Mayor David Redmond will write to Mayor Yoshihide Yada of the shire's sister city Chuo, Japan, to restate the council's objections to whaling.
The council became the 53rd local government area to join the Humpback Icon Project at its Monday meeting, going beyond an initial staff recommendation to simply sign up to the project.
The idea is for the council to officially "adopt" an identified humpback whale that can then be named by the community and spotted on its annual migrations.
Waverley, Randwick, Woollahra, Leichhardt, Pittwater, Manly and Mosman councils all have their own whale as part of the project already.
As part of its decision on Monday the council will erect a sign at Kurnell when the whale is named. Project director Rachel Kathriner praised the council's decision and said there was strength in numbers.
"It's very important that coastal councils, particularly councils with sister cities in Japan, show their opposition to whaling," she said.
"This project raises awareness, links the community and council and personalises the issue. "The more councils that come on board the stronger the statement that is made against whaling."
The council's environment committee had initially asked council staff for more information before making a decision on the recommendation to join the project.
Concerns were raised that participation might offend Chuo. Councillors were also worried about the potential for any "shire whale" to eventually end up on the chopping block at Tsujiki fish markets in Chuo, the world's largest, if Japan resumed humpback whaling.
Do you think the council should adopt a whale?
Media Man Australia
Whales
Politics
Environmentalists and the environment
The council became the 53rd local government area to join the Humpback Icon Project at its Monday meeting, going beyond an initial staff recommendation to simply sign up to the project.
The idea is for the council to officially "adopt" an identified humpback whale that can then be named by the community and spotted on its annual migrations.
Waverley, Randwick, Woollahra, Leichhardt, Pittwater, Manly and Mosman councils all have their own whale as part of the project already.
As part of its decision on Monday the council will erect a sign at Kurnell when the whale is named. Project director Rachel Kathriner praised the council's decision and said there was strength in numbers.
"It's very important that coastal councils, particularly councils with sister cities in Japan, show their opposition to whaling," she said.
"This project raises awareness, links the community and council and personalises the issue. "The more councils that come on board the stronger the statement that is made against whaling."
The council's environment committee had initially asked council staff for more information before making a decision on the recommendation to join the project.
Concerns were raised that participation might offend Chuo. Councillors were also worried about the potential for any "shire whale" to eventually end up on the chopping block at Tsujiki fish markets in Chuo, the world's largest, if Japan resumed humpback whaling.
Do you think the council should adopt a whale?
Media Man Australia
Whales
Politics
Environmentalists and the environment
Friday, February 08, 2008
'Sorry' shown on giant screens and TV - The Australian - 8th Feb 2008
KEVIN Rudd's apology to the Stolen Generations will be broadcast on giant TV screens in Sydney and Melbourne.
Wednesday's apology, from Parliament House in Canberra, will also be aired live on ABC television and radio and SBS television.
Indigenous Affairs Minister Jenny Macklin said special arrangements were being put in place for the thousands of people expected to descend on parliament for the apology.
“To make sure everyone can join in the spirit of the day, big screens are being erected on the lawns in front of Parliament House,” Ms Macklin said.
“Only around 800 people can be accommodated inside Parliament House, including the Great Hall and theatrette, so people wanting to be there on the day should consider watching from the lawn.”
The proceedings are scheduled to start at 9am (AEDT), when the Prime Minister will move a motion of apology on behalf of the Australian parliament.
Along Commonwealth Avenue and Kings Avenue in Canberra the Australian, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander flags will be raised.
The event will also be broadcast on giant screens in Sydney and Melbourne.
After the apology, indigenous performers including country music singer Troy Cassar-Daly will entertain the crowds.
Events acknowledging and celebrating the national apology were being planned by state and territory governments around the country, Ms Macklin said.
AAP, AFP
Media Man Australia Profiles
Aboriginal and Indigenous Media Directory
Politics
Wednesday's apology, from Parliament House in Canberra, will also be aired live on ABC television and radio and SBS television.
Indigenous Affairs Minister Jenny Macklin said special arrangements were being put in place for the thousands of people expected to descend on parliament for the apology.
“To make sure everyone can join in the spirit of the day, big screens are being erected on the lawns in front of Parliament House,” Ms Macklin said.
“Only around 800 people can be accommodated inside Parliament House, including the Great Hall and theatrette, so people wanting to be there on the day should consider watching from the lawn.”
The proceedings are scheduled to start at 9am (AEDT), when the Prime Minister will move a motion of apology on behalf of the Australian parliament.
Along Commonwealth Avenue and Kings Avenue in Canberra the Australian, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander flags will be raised.
The event will also be broadcast on giant screens in Sydney and Melbourne.
After the apology, indigenous performers including country music singer Troy Cassar-Daly will entertain the crowds.
Events acknowledging and celebrating the national apology were being planned by state and territory governments around the country, Ms Macklin said.
AAP, AFP
Media Man Australia Profiles
Aboriginal and Indigenous Media Directory
Politics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)